Connect with us
  • MY MONEY

    Inside Equity Bank, Dei Pharmaceuticals Tycoon Magoola Fresh Legal Fight Over Shs578bn Bailout From M7 Government …

    Published

    on

    Dr. Mathias Magoola (bottom R) is battling Anthony Kituuka's Equity Bank over a loan facility they offered him

    Dr. Mathias Magoola together with his companies Dei Industries International Limited and Dei Biopharma limited formally Dei Natural Products International industries limited has institute a commercial suit in the High Court Commercial Division accuses Equity bank Uganda and Kenya of fraudulently scheming to target the money given to him by President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s government to settle his financial troubles and save his companies.

    A few months back, parliament approved Shs578bn to be given to Magoola as bailout to his companies which were facing financial hardships with banks threatening to auction his properties which he used as security.

    However, through his lawyers led by commercial law giant Fred Muwema, Magoola alleges that when the bank got information that government had bailed him out, it started inflating his loan balance of with the mission of taking all the money given to him by government.

    He wants court to declare that the bank’s demand dated 27th June, 2024 both in US dollars and shillings for the payment of the outstanding loan was illegal.

    He explain to court that in 2016, he entered into a banker-customer relationship with equity bank and he applied for and obtained a credit facility of Shs400m to finance the completion of the construction of his factory at Kyadondo Block 82, plot 3228 Kiryamuli.

    He continued obtaining several loans in subsequent years from the same financial institution.

    He notes that all the credit facilities he obtained from equity bank contained a clause which encouraged him to seek independent legal advice in order to understand all the terms and conditions of the loan he was receiving.

    He explains that despite the said clause, the bank officers were overbearing in their advice to him to take the loans as offered owing to the cordial relationship between the parties and thus he took their advice and signed the credit offer letters without consulting external legal lawyers.

    He pins Samuel Kirubi, a manager at equity bank Uganda, Jimmy Mwangagi the Head of Credit, Munywa the Head of Risk, Abel Musiime the Head of Trade and Finance and Edward Ocen the legal officer of the bank for having guided and advised him when signing the loan transaction papers.

    He adds that he was compelled to take the said loans, variation of terms, consolidations and restructures as offered because he was in urgent need of money to finance his capital-intensive projects.

    Magoola accuses the bank officers of placing him in a tight spot with real threats of default foreclosure of his businesses which left him with no option but to accede to the bank’s demands.

    He claims that counsel John Kabandize whose signature was seen on the signed documents as his lawyer was merely a witness to the agreement.

    He explained to court that his companies faced hardship in servicing the loans due to unforeseen circumstances like Covid-19 outbreak and the Russian-Ukraine war which affected wheat imports for one of his companies dealing in import of wheat.

    These hardships forced him to close it three years back.

    He added that the delays in the completion of his medical plant also affected his plans of servicing his loans which resulted into high interest repayments to more than Shs150bn.

    “That the defendants who are in a dominant bargaining position took advantage of the plaintiff’s desperation to engage in predatory lending practice done in violation of his non-delegable fiduciary and statutory duties,” he stated.

    Magoola informed court that he reach out to the bank’s managers pleading with them to be reasonable in their demands.

    He first requested for a waiver of exorbitant loan interests, then he asked to settle the outstanding loan that was at the tune of Shs155,188,727,733.

    When all his prayers were rejected by the bank, which insisted on receiving full payment of the outstanding loan as demanded, he hired a certified public accounting firm to review the credit facilities and loan statements so as to determine the correct outstanding loan.

    The firm issued an initial preliminary report which after full examination of the few loan statements availed, revealed that the banks had inflated the loan outstanding claim by a sum of Shs39,241,743,163.

    He decided to inform the bank in writing.

    Based on the explanation to court, Magoola and his companies prayed to court to issue an order for an account audit and reconciliation of the loan and the current accounts his companies held with the said banks to determine his actual debt, variation of terms, loan consolidations and also restructure it.

    He also wants the court to issue a court order directing the banks to credit the plaintiff’s loan or current accounts with any amount of money found to be unlawfully debited upon the taking of an account, audit and reconciliation.

    He wants court to also direct the bank to refund Shs47,652,951,120 which was unlawfully debited from his loan accounts and also declare that that the interest deducted during moratorium period for credit facilities on account No. 2220578883978 and 2220580311116 amounting to US$4,331,424 was illegal explaining that it denied him cash flow and caused loss and damages to his projects.

    Magoola wants a declaration that the receipt, withholding and transfer of his US$9m loan repayment by equity bank Uganda to equity bank Kenya was an arbitrary act which exposes him to unnecessary penalty interest for which the defendants are liable to refund.

    He insists that during the transfer of his money, they charged him Shs1,045,000,000 as interest which he says was an unlawful. He wants the funds to be returned.

    He notes that the conversion of his US$2.430m credit facility to Shs11.5bn denied him liquidity and resulted in exchange loss to the tune of US$42,750 which the defendants are liable to refund.

    The debiting of Shs80,000,000 as a loan processing fee for variation of terms and loan restructures in the credit facility of Shs16bn was extortionate and unconscionable.

    He further wants the court to declare that the bank’s predatory lending practices resulted in a breach of the bank’s fiduciary and statutory duties owed to him.

    The banks have not yet filed their defense so that the matter can kickoff.

     

    By Sengooba Alirabaki

    Comments

    MY MONEY

    Tycoon Bitature’s Financial Troubles Deepen As Lawyers Kick Off Process Of Winding Up His Electricity Company; Banks Set To Auction His Multibillion Properties…

    Published

    on

    Troubled businessman Patrick Bitature

    Lawyers have started the process of winding up controversial city tycoon Patrick Bitature’s electricity Company as his financial troubles deepen.

    Early this week, David Mpanga of AF Mpanga Advocates placed an advert in the newspaper revealing the kickoff of the process of winding up Bitature’s Electro-Maxx Uganda Limited by Oryx Oil Uganda Limited.

    “Take Notice that on the 11th day of September 2024, a petition for winding up in respect of Electro-Maxx Uganda Limited was lodged in the High Court (Commercial Division),” the advert read in part.

    Electro-Maxx has been struggling with a number of Court cases including the Shs4.3bn legal battle with Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL) and Citibank where the company is accused of trying to defraud the bank and the government owned electricity company.

    theGrapevine exclusively learnt that ABSA bank has also started the process of auctioning Bitature’s multi million properties after he lost the application where he was trying to frustrate the bank’s effort to recover Shs50bn which he secured on behalf of his Electro-Maxx company.

    In his application, Bitature wanted Justice Grace Magala of the High Court Commercial Division to issue a directive stopping the bank from recovering the said amount of money claiming that he was not indebted to the bank.

    He added that he has never signed a contract or stood as a guarantor.

    He maintained that the judgement which the bank wanted to execute against him is before the Court of Appeal.

    Bitature through his lawyers led by Brian Moogi claimed that Electro-Maxx filed an application before the Commercial Division of the High Court seeking for stay of execution against it based on a Consent judgment.

    He pleaded to the Court that he has a good defense to the suit and it is just and equitable and in the interest of justice that the application and orders sought for are granted.

    However, ABSA through their lawyers lead by Counsel Timothy Kanyerezi Masembe based on the affidavit of Esther Masawi, the bank’s Head Business Support and Corporate Recoveries to protest the application noting that it abuses the court process and was filed in bad faith.

    She explained to court that Bitature was being sued as a guarantor for indebtedness of Electro-Maxx (U) Limited (the Principal Debtor) which indebtedness was agreed to by a consent judgment dated 24th May, 2020 that was signed by Bitature on behalf of Electro-Maxx.

    She added that they agreed that the indebtedness was subsequently reduced upon the payment of 13 monthly instalments and as at 31st August 2023, the indebtedness stood at USD $ 13,568,876 which is now the subject of the demand for payment on Bitature as a guarantor.

    In her ruling, Justice Magala established that the application for stay of execution which Bitature claimed was still pending before the court over the matter was dismissed on the 23rd October, 2023 by His Lordship Justice Stephen Mubiru the head of the Commercial Division of the High Court.

    The judge further established that Bitature and Simba Oil company signed as a guarantor on behalf of Electro-Maxx when it was securing a loan of USD 40,730,000 and USD 10,000,000 from the financial institution in 2014.

    “In my opinion, the two instances i.e. the Consent Judgment dated 15th May 2020 and endorsed by Court on the 21st May, 2020, with its Variations and the guarantor liability of the Applicant under the Guarantee document dated 30th April, 2014 and Guarantee document dated 6th August 2018, are quite distinguishable. The latter can be enforced against the Applicant independently,” the judge stated.

    The development comes at a time when Bitature is still battling with the South African Money Lending Company the M/S Vantage Mezzanine Fund 11 Partnership which wanted to auction his companies; Simba Properties Investment Company Limited and Simba Telecom Limited.

    Vintage agents also wanted to illegally sell by auction; Elizabeth Apartments at Kololo Kampala, Protea Hotel at Naguru Kampala, Sky Hotels at Kampala, Moyo Close Apartments and Kololo Gardens claiming that they are demanding Bitature over $32m.

     

    By Sengooba Alirabaki

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    CRIME

    Ugandan Shipping Company Bosses In Trouble As Court Orders Them To Compensate Kenyans Shs200m For Causing Death Of Their Family Members…

    Published

    on

    Justice Musa Sekaana the head of the Civil Division of the High Court has allowed the registration of the judgment issued in Kenya against a Ugandan shipping company.

    According to court documents, Mary Nyambura Mukuha and Grace Wanjiru Nyambura are suing as legal representatives of the Estate of Paul Nyutu, Stephen Mwaura and John Mukuha Wanjiru who died because of the negligence of a registered agent of Three Way Shipping Group of Companies Limited.

    In her affidavit, Nyambura told Court that they are seeking a court directive to register the judgment issued by Naivasha Chief Magistrate Court so as to execute the orders against Three Ways Shipping Company which is incorporated in Uganda and has offices along Jinja road opposite Jinja road police station.

    She explained to the court that their three people were riding a Motorcycle Reg No. KMCA 016P on 27th October 2013 when they were knocked and killed by a trailer with Ugandan Registration No. plates UAL 839N.

    She added that they instituted a case against the shipping company and fully served them with court documents but they intentionally refused to file a defense and the matter proceeded by way of formal proof.

    The judgment was delivered on 4th march 2020.

    She told court that they executed their judgment and on 30th April, 2023, court issued a court order allowing them to recover a decretal sum, costs and interest from the date of judgment totaling to Kshs 8,607,615/= (UGX 238,204,903.59).

    In his ruling, Justice Ssekaana noted that his court took judicial notice of the fact that Kenya is a Commonwealth country, and it being a protectorate of Britain which has a reciprocal arrangement with Uganda, the matter before him emanates from Naivasha Chief Magistrates Court which is located in Kenya and was properly seized with jurisdiction to hear and determine a matter.

    He explained that it is not the duty of his court to entertain an application for registration of a foreign judgment to sit on appeal over the decision of the original court that delivered the judgment sought to be registered.

    He further wondered why the shipping company does not exercise its right of appeal under the laws of the foreign country challenging the decision passed against it noting that his court only needs to ensure that the applicant complies with the requirements of the courts on registration of foreign judgment which was done.

    The applicants through their lawyers led by Lastone Gulume have started the process of recovering their money including auctioning off the properties owned by the financially troubled shipping companies.

    The Company’s top founding directors Oscar Baitwa and Geoffrey Bahamaiso are also facing criminal charges before the Anti-Corruption Division of the High Court on the allegation of stealing Shs7bn from MTN Uganda.

     

    By Grapevine reporter

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    MY MONEY

    Kampala City Traders Boss Kabanda In Deep Trouble For Mismanaging Money Members Contributed To Fight EFRIS…

    Published

    on

    FUTA chairperson John Kabanda (L) and Godfrey Katongole (R)

    Kampala city traders associations members under their umbrella body the Federation of Uganda Traders Association (FUTA) have tasked their controversial chairperson John Kabanda to give them accountability for the funds they contributed to run federation activities.

    Isaac Kauma, a member of Kampala Traders Association, exclusively revealed to theGrapevine that Kabanda turned furious and started spreading malicious propaganda against a section of traders who are demanding for accountability of their money which they have been contributing since last year.

    Kauma narrated that when President Museveni confirmed that he was going meet them again on 18th July, 2024 at Kololo Airstrip ground to further discuss their grievances over the controversial Electronic Fiscal Receipting and Invoicing Solution (EFRIS), Kabanda and other FUTA leaders approached traders and asked them to contribute money which they were going to use to transport traders from all corners of the country to fill the entire venue to show the president that they have the numbers and the capacity.

    He added that Kabanda confirmed to them that they need numbers to out compete members of the Kampala City Traders Association (KACITA) who wanted to show the president that they are the ones controlling traders after accusing KACITA leadership of betraying them and by being in bed with Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) which was imposing EFRIS on them.

    Kauma asserted that more than 1000 traders around Kampala city contributed between Shs10,000-Shs20,000 but the meeting didn’t take place because the venue was under renovation and the president promised to meet them on another date.

    He said that State House made the said announcement after Kabanda and other traders’ leaders met Museveni at State House Entebbe and they were told that Kabanda and his deputy chairperson Godfrey Katongole asked the president for a private meeting with him which the president accepted.

    Kauma added that they later learnt that Kabanda and Katongole asked the President to give them Shs3bn to mobilize traders to accept EFRIS a proposal the president declined to accept.

    The President told them that he doesn’t the money they were asking for but promised to put Shs300m in their SACCO.

    “From that day, Kabanda’s behavior is questionable, he always doesn’t want to be asked questions on why the president is not meeting us and turns furious when asked to give us accountability for the money we contributed for the function which didn’t take place,” Kauma said.

    He revealed that the accountability issue has weakened the federation thus causing a sharp fight between Kabanda and Katongole.

    Other traders allege that Kabanda has fired Katongole from being his vice chairperson and removed him from their WhatsApp group and replaced him with Moses Lwegaba the chairperson of Katukazane Shoe Dealers Association.

    Sources claim that Katongole supporters are now threatening to take action against Kabanda for firing the man who has done everything in the struggle to fight for traders and replaced him with a newcomer.

    Insiders are now alleging that the two leaders are fighting over a bribe they received during the EFRIS strike when traders closed their shops.

    There is another allegation that Katongole was given money to go to the Eastern part of the country and mobilize traders to join the strike but he refused to go and decided to hide in Kampala.

    When he was put under pressure to provide evidence that he traveled upcountry and had none, he was shown the exit.

    When contacted, Kabanda confirmed the infighting, explaining that it is aimed at weakening his FUTA leadership and the trust that the traders have placed in them.

    He revealed that even though he is receiving threatening messages, his resolve is still strong and he is ready to fight for all traders.

    He denied allegations of mismanaging traders’ money.

     

    By Timothy Nyanzi

    Comments

    Continue Reading

    like us

    TRENDING

    theGrapevine is a subsidiary of Newco Publications Limited, a Ugandan multimedia group.
    We keep you posted on the latest from Uganda and the World. COPYRIGHT © 2022
    P.O Box 5511, Kampala - Uganda Tel: +256-752 227640 Email: info@thegrapevine.co.ug
    theGrapevine is licenced by Uganda Communications Commission (UCC)