Dr. Mathias Magoola together with his companies Dei Industries International Limited and Dei Biopharma limited formally Dei Natural Products International industries limited has institute a commercial suit in the High Court Commercial Division accuses Equity bank Uganda and Kenya of fraudulently scheming to target the money given to him by President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s government to settle his financial troubles and save his companies.
A few months back, parliament approved Shs578bn to be given to Magoola as bailout to his companies which were facing financial hardships with banks threatening to auction his properties which he used as security.
However, through his lawyers led by commercial law giant Fred Muwema, Magoola alleges that when the bank got information that government had bailed him out, it started inflating his loan balance of with the mission of taking all the money given to him by government.
He wants court to declare that the bank’s demand dated 27th June, 2024 both in US dollars and shillings for the payment of the outstanding loan was illegal.
He explain to court that in 2016, he entered into a banker-customer relationship with equity bank and he applied for and obtained a credit facility of Shs400m to finance the completion of the construction of his factory at Kyadondo Block 82, plot 3228 Kiryamuli.
He continued obtaining several loans in subsequent years from the same financial institution.
He notes that all the credit facilities he obtained from equity bank contained a clause which encouraged him to seek independent legal advice in order to understand all the terms and conditions of the loan he was receiving.
He explains that despite the said clause, the bank officers were overbearing in their advice to him to take the loans as offered owing to the cordial relationship between the parties and thus he took their advice and signed the credit offer letters without consulting external legal lawyers.
He pins Samuel Kirubi, a manager at equity bank Uganda, Jimmy Mwangagi the Head of Credit, Munywa the Head of Risk, Abel Musiime the Head of Trade and Finance and Edward Ocen the legal officer of the bank for having guided and advised him when signing the loan transaction papers.
He adds that he was compelled to take the said loans, variation of terms, consolidations and restructures as offered because he was in urgent need of money to finance his capital-intensive projects.
Magoola accuses the bank officers of placing him in a tight spot with real threats of default foreclosure of his businesses which left him with no option but to accede to the bank’s demands.
He claims that counsel John Kabandize whose signature was seen on the signed documents as his lawyer was merely a witness to the agreement.
He explained to court that his companies faced hardship in servicing the loans due to unforeseen circumstances like Covid-19 outbreak and the Russian-Ukraine war which affected wheat imports for one of his companies dealing in import of wheat.
These hardships forced him to close it three years back.
He added that the delays in the completion of his medical plant also affected his plans of servicing his loans which resulted into high interest repayments to more than Shs150bn.
“That the defendants who are in a dominant bargaining position took advantage of the plaintiff’s desperation to engage in predatory lending practice done in violation of his non-delegable fiduciary and statutory duties,” he stated.
Magoola informed court that he reach out to the bank’s managers pleading with them to be reasonable in their demands.
He first requested for a waiver of exorbitant loan interests, then he asked to settle the outstanding loan that was at the tune of Shs155,188,727,733.
When all his prayers were rejected by the bank, which insisted on receiving full payment of the outstanding loan as demanded, he hired a certified public accounting firm to review the credit facilities and loan statements so as to determine the correct outstanding loan.
The firm issued an initial preliminary report which after full examination of the few loan statements availed, revealed that the banks had inflated the loan outstanding claim by a sum of Shs39,241,743,163.
He decided to inform the bank in writing.
Based on the explanation to court, Magoola and his companies prayed to court to issue an order for an account audit and reconciliation of the loan and the current accounts his companies held with the said banks to determine his actual debt, variation of terms, loan consolidations and also restructure it.
He also wants the court to issue a court order directing the banks to credit the plaintiff’s loan or current accounts with any amount of money found to be unlawfully debited upon the taking of an account, audit and reconciliation.
He wants court to also direct the bank to refund Shs47,652,951,120 which was unlawfully debited from his loan accounts and also declare that that the interest deducted during moratorium period for credit facilities on account No. 2220578883978 and 2220580311116 amounting to US$4,331,424 was illegal explaining that it denied him cash flow and caused loss and damages to his projects.
Magoola wants a declaration that the receipt, withholding and transfer of his US$9m loan repayment by equity bank Uganda to equity bank Kenya was an arbitrary act which exposes him to unnecessary penalty interest for which the defendants are liable to refund.
He insists that during the transfer of his money, they charged him Shs1,045,000,000 as interest which he says was an unlawful. He wants the funds to be returned.
He notes that the conversion of his US$2.430m credit facility to Shs11.5bn denied him liquidity and resulted in exchange loss to the tune of US$42,750 which the defendants are liable to refund.
The debiting of Shs80,000,000 as a loan processing fee for variation of terms and loan restructures in the credit facility of Shs16bn was extortionate and unconscionable.
He further wants the court to declare that the bank’s predatory lending practices resulted in a breach of the bank’s fiduciary and statutory duties owed to him.
The banks have not yet filed their defense so that the matter can kickoff.
By Sengooba Alirabaki
Leave a Reply